Two Republican committee chairmen, James Comer of Kentucky and Jim Jordan of Ohio, have reinitiated their inquiry into President Joe Biden, alleging potential interference with his son Hunter Biden’s cooperation in the House’s impeachment investigation.
A statement from the White House impIied President Joe Biden was aware of Hunter’s intention to defy congressional subpoenas, prompting the investigation.
The statement read: “The Committees issued subpoenas to Hunter Biden for a deposition to be conducted on December 13, 2023. In correspondence with Mr. Biden’s attorney prior to the scheduled deposition, the Committees addressed and dismissed Mr. Biden’s justifications for non-compliance with the subpoenas, as well as his request for special treatment.”
In December, the United States House of Representatives voted to formally authorize an investigation into President Joe Biden’s potential impeachment.
With a party-line vote of 221-212, the Republican-controlled chamber endorsed the inquiry, probing whether Biden unlawfully benefited from his son Hunter Biden’s international business ventures. Hunter Biden had earlier declined an invitation to testify privately.
Newly appointed House Speaker Mike Johnson recently discussed the impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden, asserting, “We have a duty to pursue it.”
“These are serious times and this is a very serious matter. Next to the Declaration of W*r, impeachment may be the most consequential power Congress holds. That constitutional responsibility rests with the House,” Johnson began at a press briefing.
“We must pursue the facts wherever they lead. Facts are stubborn things, as John Adams famously said. These facts are alarming to the American people and to us. While we take no pleasure in these proceedings, we have a duty to act. We are proud of the work of Chairmen Comer, Jordan, and Smith. They have diligently uncovered evident corru ption involving President Biden and the Biden family. We owe it to the American people to continue this process methodically and transparently,” Johnson added.
He continued, “To do this appropriately and uphold our constitutional duty, we need time and a sound process. Rushing is not an option if we are to remain faithful to the Constitution. The chairmen are committed to proceeding in this manner. We have heard from whistleblowers, Biden business associates, legal experts, and now it is crucial to hear from key witnesses.”
“The chairmen have issued subpoenas, and we expect them to be complied with promptly. We are not making any prejudgments. We will follow the facts wherever they lead. I fully support our chairmen in their efforts, and we will have more updates in the days ahead. Now, we will take some questions.”
15 Real People Who Look Exactly Like Famous Cartoon Characters
Many of us have fantasized about encountering a Prince Charming or greeting a Disney princess. Although meeting these characters in real life may not be possible, we can keep the dream alive by appreciating those who remarkably resemble our favorite fairy tale figures. Whether by chance or destiny, these celebrities look exactly like famous cartoon characters.
1. Ed Sheeran / Chuckie in Rugrats (1991)
2. Christina Hendrix / Jessica Rabbit in Who Framed Roger Rabbit? (1988)
3. Mel Gibson / Tarzan in Tarzan (1999)
4. Chris Hemsworth / John Smith in Pocahontas (1995)
5. Zac Efron / Hiccup in How To Train Your Dragon (2010)
6. Julia Jones / Pocahontas in Pocahontas (1995)
7. Logan Paul / Kristoff in Frozen (2013)
8. Will Poulter / Sid in Toy Story (1995)
9. Haley Joel Osment / Shaggy in Scooby-Doo, Where are You! (1969)
10. Sandra Bullock / Carmen Sandiego in Where In The World Is Carmen Sandiego? (1985)
11. Gillian Anderson / Lois Griffin in Family Guy
12. John Legend / Arthur in Arthur (1996)
13. Neil Patrick Harris / The Riddler in Batman: The Animated Series (1992)
14. Nikolaj Coster-Waldau / Prince Charming in Shrek 2 (2004)
15. Megan Fox / the Evil Queen in Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs
We often picture Disney princesses in their iconic dresses, like Belle’s yellow gown. But, those outfits aren’t historically accurate to the 18th century. So, we used artificial intelligence to create more authentic versions of these dresses, and we’re excited to show you the results. Check more here.
Leave a Reply