Some people online were not happy with the dress Jennifer Aniston wore to the awards event, while others loved it.
At the 2024 Emmys on Sunday, September 15, Jennifer Aniston, 55, made a stunning appearance on the red carpet in a strapless dress. The “Morning Show” star, who briefly mentioned working with her co-star Reese Witherspoon at the Emmys, received a lot of reactions online about her outfit.
Aniston wore a beautiful silver gown by the famous designer Oscar de la Renta. The strapless dress was adorned with intricate beadwork that matched perfectly with her jewelry.
To add even more elegance, Aniston wore a stunning diamond and platinum ring, bracelet, and vintage earrings from Tiffany & Co. She kept her blonde and dark-colored hair loose.
Several pop culture websites posted eye-catching photos and videos of Aniston striking poses on the red carpet. Fans and critics online had strong reactions to the coverage of her appearance.
Some people were not impressed with her outfit and shared their thoughts online. One person on Facebook commented, “She has worn this look so many times,” while another said, “It doesn’t fit well at the waist. She always goes for the same style. .”
Another person echoed similar thoughts, writing, “Omg, change your look; it’s always the same…” Agreeing with this view, another commenter said, “She’s beautiful, but it’s always the same!” Meanwhile, a Facebook user simply stated, “Overrated!”
While some believe Aniston’s latest look is repetitive, Page Six reports that at the 2024 SAG Awards, she chose a different route with a sparkling silver gown from Celine.
Before this year’s Emmys and the SAG Awards, Aniston usually favored a little black dress (LBD) for red carpets. However, she broke from her usual style when she wore a red Reformation dress, priced under $300, to an Emmy Awards pre-show event earlier in 2024.
Despite the criticism Aniston faced for her 2024 Emmys look, many people praised her appearance as well. The official Instagram account for the Emmys/Television Academy celebrated her style with a post that featured photos of the actress and the caption, “She is beauty she is grace – #JenniferAniston
“She looks absolutely stunning!!” exclaimed a fan on Facebook. Another admirer praised her by saying, “Perfect always yet appears effortless and always classy. Admirable especially when others are showing their underwear. She really stands out.”
Their series, “The Morning Show,” was nominated for Outstanding Drama Series. While on the red carpet, Jennifer Aniston chatted briefly with E! about her working relationship with Reese Witherspoon.
She shared, “We’ve grown up together. We were kids together and now we’re grown-ups together… I couldn’t ask for a better partner.”
A TV presenter with a Māori face tattoo fires back at cruel trolls.
Reiterating her pride in her cultural heritage and identity, a TV hostess with a customary Māori face tattoo gracefully responded to trolling remarks.
These pictures often start online debates about facial tattoos. Some people accept the cultural significance of these motifs, while others think tattoos should only be placed to the body.
Oriini Kaipara, 41, is a trailblazing TV presenter who made history at Newshub in New Zealand when she began her career as a newsreader. She was the first to present a primetime TV news report while donning the traditional Māori women’s marking, the moko kauae.
Moko kauae are vitally significant symbols of Māori history and identity, as they are considered by the native Polynesian population of the mainland of New Zealand. These facial tattoos, which are typically applied to the lips and chins, honor a woman’s heritage, status, and skills while also denoting her leadership in her community and within her family.
However, in the midst of all the appreciation, Newshub received an email from a viewer named David who was unhappy with Kaipara’s moko kauae.
He responded, “We continue to object strongly to you using a Māori newsreader with a moku [moko], which is offensive and aggressive looking,” as reported by the Daily Mail.A nasty look. She also speaks incoherently in our non-English tongue, Māori. Now put an end to it.
Kaipara boldly addressed the issue head-on in spite of David’s disparaging remarks, sharing images of the messages on her Instagram story and responding in a refined and polite way.
“Today, I’d had enough.” I responded. I never behave like that. She posted a picture of David’s message to Instagram with the remark, “I hit the send button and broke my own code.”
Furthermore, Kaipara made public the email discussion she had with David in which she said she couldn’t take David’s complaint seriously “given there is no breach of broadcast standards.”
She also made an effort to correct his spelling of “moko,” as David had referred to hers as “moku.”
Kaipara stated in her email, “I understand your complaints originate from a place of preference on how one must look on-screen.” This kind of intolerance, harassment, or prejudice is not warranted for Moko and others around her; they are not dangerous.
“We don’t intend to cause harm or have any bad intentions, and neither do we/I deserve to be treated with such disregard,” she continued. “Please stop complaining and wait until a later time, preferably the 1800s, to express your cultural ignorance and bias.”
Kaipara swiftly stressed that most of her comments are pleasant and that ugly trolls are uncommon, even in the wake of David’s negative remarks.
Shortly after responding to David’s complaint, Kaipara spoke with the New Zealand Herald about the need for more Māori activists. “The fact that some people find my existence upsetting is evidence of the need for more Māori advocates in important positions throughout every sector,” she stated.
All things considered, Kaipara’s cool response serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of cultural pride and resilience in the face of adversity. She is also inspiring people to embrace their identities with courage and speak out against discrimination.
What are your thoughts on this story? Tell us in the section that follows!
Leave a Reply