Heavily-Tattooed Woman Says It’s “Not Fair” That She Can’t Get A Job

Following a woman’s accusation that TJ Maxx was discriminating against her due to her appearance, a subsequent instance involving a job rejection at the store has generated controversy. 23-year-old Ash Putnam, who goes by @ashxobrien on TikTok, talked about how she was turned down for a part-time job at the store because of her body piercings and tattoos.

Putnam claims that after applying for the job, she got an email a few weeks later rejecting her application. Disappointed by the information, she vented her annoyance on TikTok and sparked a discussion on discrimination in employment.

Putnam’s initial grievance was with the impersonality of getting an email rejection instead of a call. Even though this is standard procedure for big businesses, she thought it was disrespectful considering how hard she worked to apply for the position.

When Putnam went to her neighborhood TJ Maxx to personally find out why she was rejected, a staff member informed her that she didn’t have enough experience for the role. Despite the employee’s insistence to the contrary, she suspected that her tattoos had a big influence on the choice.

Putnam stressed that, despite her unhappiness, she wasn’t necessarily in need of the work and was just looking for extra money to help her pay off debt faster. She thought it was unjust, though, that her tattoos appeared to be a deciding factor in her employability.

Putnam has obvious tattoos of images associated with Satanism, including a Leviathan Cross and a goat that symbolizes the god Baphomet. Thousands of TikTok users commented on her post, implying that her tattoos probably affected the decision, even though it’s unclear whether hiring supervisors noticed them when she applied.

Visible tattoos, according to some reviewers, may be viewed as unprofessional, particularly in jobs where employees interact with customers like those at TJ Maxx. Others brought out the difficulty of finding a job for young folks without any prior work experience if employers value experience over potential.

The event brought up more general concerns about how society views physical alterations and employment procedures. Putnam questioned why having a tattoo should prevent someone from getting a job, given that many tattoo bearers are quite skilled workers.

Putnam’s tattoos may not have had a direct impact on her rejection, but the event brings attention to the ongoing discussion over appearance-based discrimination in the workplace. It’s critical to think about how hiring procedures may be more inclusive and equal for all candidates, regardless of appearance, as the conversation continues.

A Nostalgic Kitchen Gadget with Lasting Appeal

Past Events

An inexpensive yet necessary kitchen equipment that has been around since the 19th century is the citrus peeler. With the increasing availability and popularity of citrus fruits, especially in the late 1800s and early 1900s, people started looking for an easy way to peel them. The thick rinds of oranges, lemons, and other citrus fruits were easily sliced through by the early citrus peelers, which were frequently constructed of metal and had sharp hooks or blades.

As home cooking became more common around the middle of the 20th century, citrus peelers’ appearance changed. Plastic peelers were first produced by companies such as Tupperware, which gained popularity because to its robustness and user-friendliness. These peelers were more comfortable to hold since they frequently had ergonomic features. These retro peelers’ simplified, vibrant shapes became famous, capturing the inventiveness and optimism of the post-war period.

Application

The main purpose of a citrus peeler is to remove the outer rind of citrus fruits without contaminating the inner flesh. Conventional peelers frequently feature a small blade or pointed end that slices the skin, enabling sectional skin removal. A spoon-like end that lifts the peel away from the fruit is another feature on some peelers.

Citrus peelers have evolved into useful instruments over time. Although they are most frequently used to peel oranges, lemons, and grapefruits, they can also be used to peel other fruits and vegetables with comparable skins, make garnishes, and zest citrus for cooking. Professional chefs and family cooks alike love citrus peelers for their effectiveness and simplicity of use.

History

The durability and ease of use of the citrus peeler have left a lasting legacy. Old citrus peelers, particularly those from the middle of the 20th century, are now sought-after collectibles because of their nostalgic appearance and usefulness. These tools bring back memories of a bygone era when kitchen appliances were made to last and combined design and function in a way that contemporary products frequently try to imitate.

Even with the availability of contemporary kitchen appliances and peelers, the traditional style of the vintage citrus peeler is still in demand. This classic tool is still in use in kitchens all across the world, demonstrating the enduring appeal of well-designed tools. Old citrus peelers are a treasured element of culinary history, valued by collectors and foodies for their unique combination of elegance, history, and utility.

Last Words

It’s astounding to consider the lengthy and fascinating history of something as basic as a citrus peeler. These tiny gadgets, preserved by their classic style and usefulness, are more than just kitchen equipment; they are relics from our culinary history. Thus, the next time you discover one in your drawer, consider it more than simply a piece of metal or plastic—consider it a piece of history that is continuing to function, one orange peel at a time.

Related Posts

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*